*Gibber*! *Drool*!

Message ID: 170625 Posted By: freecode_99 Posted On: 2004-08-22 17:13:00 Subject: New letter finished (finally) Recs: 6 This "Sh*t for brains" person has finished his letter to the following: Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 1251 Avenue of The Americas New York, NY 10020 SEC Complaint Center 450 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20549-0213 New York State Office of the Attorney General Attn: Eliot Spitzer Bureau of Investor Protection and Securities 120 Broadway New York, NY 10271 Senator Chris Dodd SR-448 Russell Building United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Senator Chris Dodd Putnam Park 100 Great Meadow Road Wethersfield, CT 06109 Senator Charles E. Schumer 757 Third Avenue, Suite 17-02 New York, NY 10017 FBI 615 East Houston, Room 200 San Antonio, Texas 78205 In RE: Violation of RULE 33-7881, RULE 105b-1, RULE 105b-2 Have a nice day. Don't worry, be happy! freecode -------------------------------...

Message ID: 142523 Posted By: freecode_99 Posted On: 2004-06-09 09:13:00 Subject: January 4 Sarbanes-Oxley Letter Recs: 9 "January 4, 2004 Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 1666 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-2803 Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 1251 Avenue of The Americas New York, NY 10020 SEC Complaint Center 450 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20549-0213 New York State Office of the Attorney General Attn: Eliot Spitzer Bureau of Investor Protection and Securities 120 Broadway New York, NY 10271 RE: Potential Sarbanes-Oxley violations by the Public Company now known as the SCO Group, formerly known as Caldera, Inc., Caldera Systems, and Caldera International, a Canopy Group company for failure to disclose known risks in SEC filings with consistency for a period of no less than 6 months" Before you ask luddite, they do have these letters and they are specific as to the violations by section. The non-disclosure of th...

Message ID: 142318 Posted By: freecode_99 Posted On: 2004-06-08 15:54:00 Subject: A letter Recs: 12 "March 7, 2004 Office of Policy and Evaluation Room 394 Bureau of Competition Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, D.C. 20580 The Technical Committee 10500 NE 8th Street, Suite 625 Bellevue, WA 98004 Coordinated State Enforcement of Microsoft Antitrust Judgments c/o California Office of the Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102 New York State Office of the Attorney General Attn: Eliot Spitzer Bureau of Investor Protection and Securities 120 Broadway New York, NY 10271 Mr. Richard Blumenthal Attorney General, State of Connecticut P.O. Box 120 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0120 Mr. Greg Abbott Office of the Attorney General PO Box 12548 Austin, TX 78711-2548 Federal Bureau of Investigation J. Edgar Hoover Building 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20535...

Message ID: 86875 Posted By: freecode_99 Posted On: 2004-01-29 08:50:00 Subject: If the MS Payment IS a loan, then... Recs: 8 time to report it to the observers of the MSFT antitrust settlement. That goes above and beyond and would amount to interference by proxy without any clean separation. It would put serious egg on their claims of non-involvement in the whole deal, and would put serious questions up about the viability of the Antitrust settlement altogether. If you can show me the link that determines it is a loan - I will gladly write the letters once again. It is time we stopped the BS and got on with business - so that means an end to the tortuous interference via proxy here. Please provide that link or bit which shows the loan status and I will get to writing an effective letter of complaint. I have also delivered my letters written to the SEC, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the NY State AG to the Wall Street Journal's Managing and A...

Message ID: 81320 Posted By: preadapted Posted On: 2004-01-15 11:39:00 Subject: Letter to NASDAQ Recs: 12 re: http://www.nasdaq.com//asp/quotes_news.asp?logopath=http%3a%2f%2fcontent.nasdaq. com%2flogos%2fSCOX.GIF&pageName=Company%20News&selected=SCOX&consumer=NDQ&StoryT argetFrame=_top&market=Nasdaq-SCM&coname=SCO%20Group,%20Inc.%20(The)&symbol=SCOX&cpath=20040115ACQPRN200401150801PR_NEWS_B_WES_LA_LATH030.htm from post # 81234 this AM Dear Sirs, I have read the article posted at the above URL and would respectfully request that you seriously consider the following: The Linux community is indeed in an uproar regarding what it perceives as an attempt to hijack hundreds of man years of legitimate copyrighted contributions by largely professional programmers from throughout the world, to a free and openly sourced computer operating system. These ladies and gentlemen quite rightly resent being characterized as "teenaged bedroo...

Message ID: 78723 Posted By: freecode_99 Posted On: 2004-01-08 12:13:00 Subject: So What Shall it Take? Recs: 1 If they have screwed the pooch by failing to disclose the risk under their fiduciary responsibilities, what part of Sarbanes-Oxley or whatever corporate governance laws does this violate? As this is yet another failure to disclose in this long-standing series of failures to disclose, I am going to complain yet again when I do find the right statute and section of the law, for they have signed their names to the documents which swore that they had disclosed all risks. They did not - so the gig is up now. That is criminal. If nothing happens, then we know that Justice has failed to perform their duty. So, what will it take to get someone to do somethign and prosecute this case at last? ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Mess...

Message ID: 35805 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2003-08-31 06:36:00 Subject: To complain about the Cohen pump Recs: 7 ...call 877-251-5685 and complain that the largest institutional holder of SCOX was able to recommend a stock, saying it had "good fundamentals," when nothing could be further from the truth. Use the ammo from threenorth h++p://www.threenorth.com/sco/index.html and threaten, responsibly, to call CBSMarketWatch, Fox and CNNfn with the same story. Then EMail wakeupcall@cnbc.com and do the same thing. two or three thousand toll-free calls and the same number of emails should get their attention. Remember to be professional and logical. It wouldn't hurt to practice what you are going to say before the call and have some notes. Also SPELLCHECK those emails, and check for punctuation and grammar. No profanity or anger, just facts. Also, send the message as plain text, not html, so it will be sure to get through. Best if sent through ...

Message ID: 21181 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2003-07-25 11:48:00 Subject: Boycott SCO/Canopy email campaign Recs: 7 Boycott SCO/Canopy email campaign. I've already done most of the work for you. Please take few minutes to send an email to these canopy group portfolio companies. I am also including a list of canopy group web-sites, and a sample of the letter that I have sent to all of these companies. I want to make it clear that I am not just sending emails. I actually intend to do all that I can to boycott these companies, and to have others boycott these companies. I want as many companies as possible to understand that any affiliation with canopy group could cause those companies to lose sales - during a time when so many technology companies are already suffering from slow sales. Maybe this won't make a world of difference. But, if enough people will just send an email, maybe this will put a little pressure on the canopy group crime syndi...

Message ID: 20984 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2003-07-24 14:07:00 Subject: My complaint to the SEC Recs: 6 if enough people complain, maybe somebody will notice. It only takes a minute. Here is the web-site, and a sample letter. h**p://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml I am writing to file a complaint regarding the actions of the SCO Group, and it’s controlling company: Canopy Group. SCO is making unspecific and unsubstantiated claims that it owns copyright pertaining to the Linux operating system. SCO has indicated that the only way for a company to use Linux legally is to buy SCO’s own UnixWare product. If Linux users were, in fact, legally required to purchase UnixWare, this would substantially boost SCO’s revenue. However, SCO has no legal basis to force companies to buy their products; and SCO knows it. I know this because I have specifically informed SCO that I am using Linux, and that I will not buy UnixWare. Predictably, SCO is not taking any legal acti...